Este caso destaca la extirpación de tres grandes quistes, con apicectomía y relleno del defecto.

The patient returned for an unscrewing of the crown of #37 (18), which induced an occlusal trauma. This ultimately led to peri-implantitis trauma.

The patient is a 35 year old female, non-smoker and generally healthy. She came to my clinic with an aesthetical problem with the crown on the implant in positioning #44 (28). Implant was inserted in wrong position (too much vestibular) from the alveolar ridge, and crown was unacceptable for the patient. Treatment Planning included extraction, implant and GBR procedure using Bond Apatite®. Insertion new implant (BICON) and anchorage of the new crown.

This case demonstrates the clinical and biological versatility of biphasic calcium sulphate. All digital. The last canine remaining was used for vertical dimension of occlusion. There was no infection and healing was great. The temp was placed 7 days post-op, and the final was placed at 4 months post-op.

La periodontitis mandibular fue tratada pero con alta exposición a las raíces y marcada movilidad dental. El paciente se da vergüenza de sonreír.

Gran lesión periapical que afecta a los dientes n.° 22 (10) y n.° 23 (11). Se realizó enucleación del quiste y apicectomía. Las fotos posteriores a la operación de dos años muestran todo el defecto lleno de hueso verdadero.

Varón sano de 47 años. Los cambios inflamatorios (quiste radicular) no están involucrados después de 3 meses post tratamiento de re-endodoncia usando microscopía. Tiene dolor y malestar de vez en cuando. Hemos realizado una resección de la raíz del diente #36 (19) con relleno del conducto radicular con el MTA, enucleación del quiste (confirmado con examen histopatológico). Rellenamos el defecto hueso con Bond Apatite® (1/2 cc).

This video shows cyst removal and apicoectomy with MTA. The defect was filled with Bond Apatite and the sutures are covered with a wound dressing.

he patient came with a cyst in the upper, right maxilla. The cyst was removed and apicoectomy performed. The defect was filled using Augma Bond Apatite and a wound dressing was placed to help protect the sutures from the oral environment.

(11), #24 (12), and #25 (13) are to be extracted at the same time. The flap will not be sufficient to cover the Bond Apatite, so Augma Shield™ was used to cover the exposed material.

A 60 years old. Came in to consult for implant treatment from tooth #23 (11) to #27 (15). Scans showed a large bone deficiency in close proximity to the sinus floor.

30 year old patient presents with pain from an infection in tooth #11 (8) and the decay of tooth #21 (9) beneath the crown.

El tratamiento se hará por etapas. Primero, se extraerán los incisivos centrales defectuosos. El reborde estrecho en el área del aumento lateral se preparará con decorticación y aumento realizado con Bond Apatite.

El examen revela una cresta alveolar estrecha que no se adapta a la colocación de cemento en el área de los molares. Se decidió realizar un aumento de reborde inicialmente, y después de unos meses de cicatrización proceder a cemento de los implantes.

El paciente vino para implantes en los incisivos centrales derecho e izquierdo. Al abrir se descubrió un defecto. Se colocaron implantes y se realizó aumento con Bond Apatite®

Se extrae el molar y se completa el injerto alveolar y el aumento de la cresta lateral con Bond Apatite. Los implantes se colocan 5 meses después de la operación.

Este video muestra extracciones, cemento cemento hueso

The patient came with highly pneumatic maxillary sinuses. The treatment plan consists of a bilateral open sinus lift and bone expansion of the residual border (2 mm) with osteotomes.

In this video see the extraction of the upper, left incisor with immediate implant placement and grafting with Bond Apatite.

The patient was 35 years old and came to the clinic for emergency treatment of tooth #21 (9). The tooth was fractured, mobile and infected. After examination we decided to extract the tooth and graft the bone defect with Bond Apatite® for the future implant.

Abstract: Calcium sulfate is used as a synthetic graft material in orthopedics, plastic surgery, oncological surgery, and dentistry, and it has been used in a variety of clinical applications, such as the repair of periodontal defects, the treatment of osteomyelitis, maxillary sinus augmentation, and as a complement to the placement of dental implants. To carry out this systematic review, a bibliographic search was carried out. The PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) question was: Does Citation: Torrejon-Moya, A.; Apalimova, A.; González-Navarro, B.; Zaera-Le Gal, R.; Marí-Roig, A.; López-López, J. Calcium Sulfate in Implantology (Biphasic Calcium Sul-Fate/Hydroxyapatite, BCS/HA, Bond Apatite®): Review of the Literature and Case Reports. Coatings 2022, 12, 1350. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/coatings12091350 Academic Editor: Jun-Beom Park Received: 14 August 2022 Accepted: 12 September 2022 Published: 16 September 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). the use of calcium sulfate as a material in guided bone regeneration in dentistry have better results compared to other bone graft materials? Finally, a case series is presented using the calcium sulfate for different procedures. Currently, the available literature on the use of calcium sulfate as a graft material in implant surgery is scarce, and what is available provides low-quality evidence. That is whymoreresearch studies on the subject are necessary to allow more comparisons and meaningful conclusions. After using Bond Apatite® in our case series, we can conclude that it is a useful and easy-to-handle material in implantology practice, but more controlled studies should be carried out in this regard to assess its long-term efficacy, especially in horizontal and/or vertical regeneration.

A distal root resection of tooth #46 (30) was performed with backfill of the root canal with the MTA and cyst enucleation (confirmed with histopathology examination). The bone defect was filled with 1cc Bond Apatite®.

A revision of the lower right molar was made, the tumor was removed (highly mineralized part similar to osteoma and granulation tissue from area around). We made a root resections of tooth #46 (30) with retrograde filling of the root canals using MTA. We filled the bone defect with Bond Apatite (1 cc). Histopathological study showed the presence of a odontogenic fibroma structure in granulation tissue and osteoma in mineralized part. We observed a good healing of bone and soft tissue in 2 years months follow-up.

A root resection of #42 (26) was performed with backfill of the root canal with MTA. The tumor was removed with peripheral bone curettage about one millimeter deep and the bone defect was filled with Bond Apatite® (1cc).

Se resecó la raíz del #35 (20), con relleno del conducto radicular con MTA. La enucleación del quiste se confirmó con el examen histopatológico. El defecto hueso se rellenó con Bond Apatite® (0,5 cc).

El paciente es un varón de 62 años con enfermedad periodontal avanzada, grado de movilidad II, falta de dientes y compromiso funcional y estético. Aumento y colocación inmediata de cemento de trébol.

Patient : Male, 60 year old, non-smoker. The extractions of #13 (25) and #14 (26) were realized 5 months before, including bone preservation with Augma Bond Apatite®. The option of a closed sinus lift was preferred to a lateral approach because of the flexibility of the sinus floor due to the bone preservation.

A patient came for implant placement in #14 (5) and #16 (3). An implant in # 14 (5) can be placed easily, but a sinus lift must be performed in #15 (4) and #16 (3). It was decided to avoid a lateral window approach and to perform an intra crestal sinus lift.

A patient in her fifties came for implant treatment in the left maxilla. Dr. Baranes decided to place an implant, 3.75/10 in tooth #24 (12). In #26 (14) bone width was only 1mm, so a crestal sinus floor elevation was completed first to increase the bone height. Three months post-op an implant of 3.75/10 was placed. No additional augmentation was performed as 6 mm of bone was gained.

En este video, se completa una elevación de seno cerrado con la colocación inmediata de un implante utilizando Bond cemento .

En este video, se completa una elevación cerrada del seno con la colocación inmediata de un implante utilizando Bond cemento .

The patient is 67 years old and was referred for the treatment of a fractured tooth with radiolucency. In this case there was no buccal plate and no incisions were made. Due to the lack of buccal plate, the choice was made to use Bond Apatite.

Tooth #45 (29) & #46 (30) were extracted. Tooth #44 (28) is going through an endodontic retreatment procedure.  At the time of extraction, enucleation of a cystic lesion 1 cm in diameter.

We made a root resection of tooth #35 (20) with back-fill with the MTA, cyst enucleation (confirmed with histopathology examination). We filled the bone defect with Bond Apatite (1/2 cc). Good healing and no clinical symptoms after six months was observed.

The cyst appeared 8 months after good endodontic treatment. We did a root resection of tooth #22 (10), followed by a cyst enucleation with histopathology examination. The bone defect was then filled with Bond Apatite (2cc).

The first clinical symptom was a swollen abscess. 6 weeks after the abscess incision, we did a one step endo-surgery treatment with a root resection of tooth #13 (6), cyst enucleation (with histopathology examination) and backfill of the root canal with MTA. In addition, we performed a microsurgery because of little changes around root #22 (10), which included an apicoectomy, backfill and graft with Bond Apatite®. The bone defect was filled with Bond Apatite® (2 cc).

There were long standing carries in the upper left canine, so it was decided not to proceed with a socket shield. The decay extended subgingival and drilling was done at the palatal portion of the root. Once the osteotomy was complete, periotomes were used to deflect the buccal segment to the palatal space to allow for extraction. Bond Apatite® was next followed by placement of noris medical tuff 5x13 implant and a 5mm healing abutments. Vertical mattress nylon at the papillae and 4-0 pga to retain the Augma Shield™

Un caso a largo plazo, cinco años después de aumentar con Bond Apatite. El procedimiento de injerto se realizó en la zona estética, donde faltaba una placa bucal. El paciente presentaba mal estado periodontal y acudió a consulta. Se quejaron de importante movilidad del diente #21 (9), con inflamación.

A 20 year old was referred to us to perform an implant in area #22 (10) due to agenesis (after orthodontic preparation.) The doctor wants to perform a screwed crown. This requires us to perform the implant outside the frame of the bone. We will treat the dehiscence with Bond Apatite.

El paciente presentó un puente fallido y tiene antecedentes de bisfosfonatos intravenosos y las extracciones se completaron sin colgajos. Se colocaron injerto alveolares e implantes inmediatos, y la abertura alveolar se cubrió con una esponja de colágeno para proteger el material del injerto y minimizar la posibilidad de exposición hueso .

La paciente es una mujer de 65 años, que vino por implantes. Decidimos realizar una elevación de seno abierta utilizando una ventana lateral, que rellenaremos con Bond Apatite.

Este video muestra los protocolos para una elevación de seno abierta (ventana lateral) con implantes inmediatos, así como extracciones y dehiscencia .

Video del Dr. Baranes realizando una elevación de seno cemento (cerrada) con colocación de implante inmediato.

Este caso nos muestra la evolución del seno maxilar , un año después de una elevación de seno intracrestal en dirección crestal. La paciente es una mujer diabética de unos 60 años, que acudió para un tratamiento de implantes en el maxilar superior derecho. Tenía varios años con un espacio desdentado entre el #14 (5) - #16 (3).

The conservative endodontic treatment of the tooth #26 (14) failed. We made a root resection of this buccal mesial root of tooth #26 (14,) backfilling with MTA and cyst enucleation with histopathology examination. We filled the bone defect with Bond Apatite®.

The lower right first molar was atraumatically extracted without any lingual or buccal flap. Immediate implant was placed with >50 N/Cm torque.

Hicimos un tratamiento de endodoncia del #14 (5) y una cirugía. Se extirpó el quiste radicular (con histopatología), resección radicular de los dientes #14 (5) y #15 (4) con obturación retrógrada de MTA. Rellenamos el defecto hueso con Bond Apatite® (1 cc).

Extracción y Regeneración Ósea con Sulfato de Calcio Bifásico. Seguimiento postoperatorio de 5 meses con colocación de cemento con aumento de elevación de seno.

un caso de pérdida hueso severa alrededor de implantes fallidos, que sirvieron durante unos 15 años y que recientemente se agruparon con una barra de metal para sostener una dentadura postiza superior. Todo el armazón estaba sostenido por el implante n.º 16 (3), los otros implantes estaban solo en tejido blando, el hueso restante estaba severamente atrofiado.

Segundo premolar inferior derecho con proceso apical y fístula vestibular; Marcada pérdida ósea con pérdida de la placa bucal; Hombre; 50 años; Saludable; Segundo premolar inferior derecho con proceso apical y fístula vestibular; Marcada pérdida ósea con pérdida de la placa bucal; El paciente se queja de dolor e hinchazón.

Mujer sana de 44 años presenta dolor constante y moderado en el diente n.° 30 tratado con endodoncia (46). Tres meses después del retratamiento endo de los canales MB y ML, el dolor persistió.

Se conservó el diente no erupcionado #13 (6) y se extrajo el #53 (C) temporal. Se realizó GBR con Bond Apatite® . Se colocó un implante 4 meses después de la operación, tiempo durante el cual se conectó un diente temporal con aparatos ortopédicos.

El paciente presentó una gran área de inflamación alrededor del diente #12 (7) con una lesión completa de la lámina cortical externa. Extrajimos el diente y eliminamos la inflamación (con examen histopatológico). Rellenamos el defecto hueso con Bond Apatite® (1 cc). Después de 4 meses tenemos un nuevo hueso joven en la posición del #12 (7), por lo que el implante se colocó con una buena estabilidad primaria del implante.

In this video the second premolar is extracted and 3D Bond is used to repair a sinus communication. Socket grafting is completed with Bond Apatite, and the graft is protected with a collagen plug.

The patient is a healthy 39 year old woman. The crown on tooth #16 (3) broke that day while biting bread. There was no way to rescue the tooth. She has pain and discomfort. Tooth #16 (3) was extracted without flap reflection and the defect was filled with 3D Bond™ 0.5 cc, and a collagen sponge. Bone regeneration was observed both clinically and in radiographic images 3 months post-op, and the ultrashort Bicon implant was placed (D-4.5mm, L -6.0mm). Final prosthetic restoration was done 4 months later with a full ceramic crown. In the next 12 months no inflammatory symptoms were observed.

Tooth #31 (24) presents second level of mobility, pain and the inflammatory changes. Treatment planning involved the extraction of the tooth and GBR procedure with Bond Apatite®. Four months later a Bicon implant was placed, and the final crown was placed 4 months after implant placement.

The patient presented with an infected and fractured molar with compromised buccal plate. The extraction was done in segments. Osteotomy prep grafted with Bond Apatite®, uncover osteotomy, immediate implant placement.  Note the keratinized gingiva around the healed implant. The key here was no flap at the time of the extraction.

and after graft placement with Augma Bond Apatite® a 6x11.5mm implant was inserted at 50n-cm final torque.

treatment of #37 (18) and extraction of #36 (19) due to deep periodontal pocket with active secretion and furcation involvement. The tooth was extracted atraumatically, and an implant was placed centrally, relying on the septum.

The patient is a woman in her 50’s, who came a day before a family event for a fixed prothetelic supported by immediate implant placement. Canine in a classic vestibular position, it will be necessary to try to keep the buccal bone wall as much as possible and reconstruct the ridge.

Failing first molar, immediate extraction and implant placement. Flap stretch to achieve primary closure. Graft with Bond Apatite.

The patient is a healthy female, 59 years old. The root of tooth #13 (6) broke without any reason. Prosthetic restoration was not possible.  The patient feels pain and discomfort. Root #13 (6) was extracted with flap opening. After that we saw partial damage of the external cortical lamina, about 5 millimeters. Immediate implant placement is performed, and the bone defect is filled with Bond Apatite® (1 cc). A full restoration of the external lamina was observed clinically 3.5 months post-op. Final prosthetic restoration was done in next 3 weeks. 12 month post-op follow-up no inflammatory symptoms were observed.

The crowns of the teeth were destroyed below the bone level and any type of reconstruction was impossible. Treatment planning includes extraction and socket grafting with Bond Apatite^®. Insertion of three Bicon implants in the areas of teeth #35 (20), 36 (19), 37 (18). Setting three crowns on the implants.

The patient is a healthy 62 old year female non-smoker. She presented 10 years after insertion and reconstruction of teeth #44 (28), #45 (29) & #46 (30). The X-ray shows a huge defect vertical and lateral around implant in position #44 (28) and tooth #43 (27).

Extraction and grafting of lower left and right molars, followed months later by open sinus lift and immediate implant.

45 year old male presented with vertical and lateral atrophy of the bone around the implant head. Implant was placed 15 years prior in tooth #45 (29).

e patient was an 18 year old presenting with congenital malformation of #12 (7) & #22 (10). The patient came after opening spaces with orthodontic treatment.

Healthy female, age 52 years. The crown and furcation of tooth #46 (30) was totally damaged. Extraction and immediate implant placement ( D-3.7 mm, L-11.5 mm) were performed and the bone defect around the implant was filled with Bond Apatite® (1 cc).

The patient is a 56 year old female, healthy & nonsmoking. Presented with a mobile bridge in her upper front left region. The distal abutment of the bridge was a broken root with caries, swelling and discharge. Tooth #26 (14) was extracted years prior. The bridge is not aesthetic enough regarding teeth #21 (9) and #22 (10), and not in proper occlusion. Periapical lesion in tooth #22 (10) and PDL widening. The treatment plan started with cutting the bridge distal to #22 (10), extracting root #25 (13) and placing three tilted implants with immediate loading, preserving all the neighboring teeth.

The patient is a healthy, 75 years old female who presented with tooth #11 (8) after a root canal, with mobility and extreme extrusion. The patient complained that she was very dissatisfied with the aesthetics and wanted to correct position of #11 (8) and close the gap between tooth #11 (8) and #21 (9). 

The planning consists of tooth extraction, Augma Bone Cement, implant insertion and a provisional screwed composite crown.  Four months post-op we place a composite restoration on #11 (8) and then final impression for final ceramic crown.

After extraction four implants were placed in positions 34 (21), 32 (23), 42 (26) and 44 (28) with good primary stability (Ires System, D-3.7 mm, L-11.5 mm). The empty alveolars between implants were filled with Bond Apatite®. The temporary overdenture was fixed on temporary abutments. During a follow up visit 3 months later the patient reported a growing pain of the left site (position 34 (21)).

The patient was referred for an implant after the extraction of tooth #12 (7). According to the CBCT, their was insufficient bone volume due to a bone defect and a residual cyst.

The patient was a young male, after failure of crown on tooth #11 (8).

En este video se coloca un implante en la zona del premolar inferior derecho. El aumento lateral con cemento hueso se realiza simultáneamente.

Los cemento óseos se utilizan para reparar una dehiscencia bucal grande y se coloca un apósito sobre las suturas para ayudar a proteger la herida y ayudar en el proceso de curación.

El paciente se presentó con un incisivo lateral superior izquierdo fisurado. El tratamiento incluye extracción, injerto e implante inmediato.

El incisivo lateral derecho se fracturó durante la comida y se quedou sin corona; Hay un falso muñón fracturado dentro del conducto radicular y también parece Para existir un quiste apical.

Extracción del diente 36 con colocación inmediata del implante; Injerto óseo; Colocación de corona de zirconia / cerámica 4 meses después.

Quad-Zygoma usando Abordaje Extra Maxilar en conjunto con Bond Apatite® , reduciendo traumatismos y evitando complicaciones en casos clínicos de Arcada Completa.

Colocación de implante #12 con carga inmediata 1,5 meses después, colocación inmediata del implante #11 con carga inmediata (la demora de 1,5 meses entre implantes es para tratar de no perder la papila entre ellos) Colocación de coronas definitivas 6 meses después.

The lower left canine is both infected and fractured. Grafting was with autogenous bone and Augma Bond Apatite®. Due to uneven socket wall levels for the canine, and implant was selected with 2mm machined collar. Augma provided bone and soft tissue enhancement. The tissue is holding around the machined collar. The final images are 18 months after restoration.

The implant is placed 11 months after augmentation. At the time of implant placement there are no visible remaining particles of Hydroxyapatite, and the implant is placed in the patient's fully regenerated bone.

El paciente es un hombre de 70 años con un puente del #45 (29) - #47 (31) que es móvil y causa dolor.

(15). In order to avoid lateral sinus lift procedure, the ridge was first reconstructed. Three months later, a minimally invasive intra-crestal sinus lift approach with immediate implant placement was performed.

The surgical treatment of a dentigerous cyst of the maxilla and the use of biphasic calcium sulfate (Bond Apatite®) in bone augmentation. The material was used during the treatment of odontogenic cyst, arising as a result of necrotic changes within the structure of an invaginated tooth #12 (7).

The patient came to our office complaining of mobility and discomfort of teeth 8,9 (11,21). The clinical and radiographic evaluation confirmed the patient’s complaint. The CBCT demonstrates a large bone deficiency at the apical level with the absence of the buccal plate.

A large cyst is removed from the aesthetic zone, and the gap is filled with Bond Apatite.

We did an enucleation and resection of roots of the upper right incisors, (#11 (8) & #12 (7)) with retrograde fillings (MTA) and augmentation with Bond Apatite® bone cement. Healing was uneventfully and after six months post op the place was asymptomatic and bone was formed.

Male age 40, cyst in the front of the mandible, range of root #31(24) and #32(23). There was pain, swelling and active buccal fistula. Enucleation of the cyst and resection with retrograde and filling (MTA) of roots #31(24) and #32(23). Augmentation was

The cyst appeared 4 years after successful endodontic and prostetic treatment. The first clinical symptom was an abscess. Three weeks after the abscess incision, we completed a one step endosurgery treatment with a root resection of tooth #12 (7), cyst enucleation (with histopathology examination), and backfill of the root canal with MTA. In addition, we used dedicated microtools and then filled the bone defect with Bond Appetite® (2 cc).

The patient reported inflammation, swelling and pain on occasion consistent with Vincent’s symptom in the area of teeth #36 (19), #20 (35), and #34 (21). The surgery was performed under general anesthesia. We removed a radicular cyst (with histopathology), root resection of #35 (20) with retrograde MTA filling, and extraction of #36 (19). The bone defect was grafted with Bond Apatite® (6 cc).

A how-to video in which Dr. Amos Yahav shows the protocols for Lateral Augmentation with Bond Apatite® and the Augma Shield™.

Patient in her sixties come for implant treatment in the maxilla on the right side. The ridge was very thin, about 2 mm. A lateral augmentation to thicken the ridge with Bond Apatite was performed. The implant in tooth #13 (6) is of 3 mm in diameter, the other implants #14 (5), #15 (4) and #17 (2) are of 3.75 mm in diameter.

The patient is a healthy, 60 year old, female with no medical history. She attended the first consultation with a fractured bridge on areas #33 (22) to #38 (17). The patient had a periapical lesion, and the edentulous section from #34 (21) - #37 (18) does not have sufficient bone width to place implants. The treatment plan was lateral augmentation with Bond Apatite® and placing 3 implants 5 months after grafting.

The patient is a 70 year old female with no health problems. Tooth #34 (21) is fractured and must be extracted, and the bridge sliced. Tooth #38 (17) will be kept for the moment.

The right lateral incisor was broken during a meal. There is a false post, difficult to remove, inside the root canal and there seems to be a cyst at the apex. The right lateral incisor was broken during a meal. There is a false post, difficult to remove, inside the root canal and there seems to be a cyst at the apex. The crown was made of resin. Trying to do a crown on the root seems less predictable than to do an immediate implant. The patient as done other implants with great success and she prefers the implant solution.              

The patient is a female, 60 year old, non-smoker. She presented with loss of the lateral plate following an infection on root fracture #25 (13). Implant placement occurs 5 months after bone preservation with Augma Bond Apatite®.

In this live surgery video we see multiple extractions and augmentation in order to prevent bone loss and maintain healthy bone. This case demonstrates the importance of augmentation procedures for preventing bone loss and maintaining healthy bone, regardless of the

Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors, and deficient buccal width of alveolar bone in edentulous areas. Simultaneous graft and implant placement.

The patient came with aesthetical problems, difficulty with chewing and failure of most of his remaining teeth. The treatment plan involved complete maxillary teeth extraction, 7 immediate implants, bone grafting with bone cements and immediate load.

62 year old male presents with painful and mobile upper left first premolar tooth. Exam revealed gingival inflammation and mobility. Exploration revealed a missing buccal plate. The plan was to remove the tooth, and graft with Bond Apatite, without flap elevation.

A patient came to the office complaining of the mobility of the old bridges, located in the anterior maxillary segment. With Bond Apatite we were able to fill gaps and large defects. Including the void left after removing the impacted canine. This was done while the site was chronically infected.

Medical Background: Breast cancer (30 months ago) Chemotherapy (with bisphosphonates) Radiation Dental Background: Severe pain and decay in tooth 18 (#8), which caused an infection of the Schneider’s membrane.  Because of the severe pain, we must intervene.

The first symptom was pain similar to pulpitis in teeth #41 (25), #42 (26) and #43 (27). After endodontic treatment, the X-rays and CBCT showed a focus of necrotizes with strongly sheading elements in the central area. We did a root resection with backfill of the root canal with MTA in teeth #42 (26) and #43 (27). The tumor was removed with peripheral bone curettage to about 1 millimeter deep. The biological structure of the tumor was similar to spongy bone, but little harder. The bone defect was filled with Bond Apatite® (2cc). The tumor was taken to histopathology. Diagnosis: Osteoid osteoma of the mandible

Este es un caso de protector de alveolo para el incisivo central derecho. Los incisivos centrales izquierdos se colocaron 8 años antes con extracción total. Uno puede notar la diferencia con la arquitectura hueso y de tejido blando entre los dos.

Diagnóstico: Granuloma y reabsorción hueso en tabique y raíz palatina.

nt es una mujer fumadora de 72 años con mala higiene. El plan de tratamiento incluye una dentadura completa en el maxilar superior, así como una dentadura completa en el maxilar inferior estabilizada por dos implantes anteriores. Se colocará una dentadura provisional en el maxilar superior e inferior durante el proceso de cicatrización.

The patient is a 46 year old male, non-smoking and generally healthy. His main complaint was about the pain in two broken teeth, #14 (5), #15 (4). A fracture line below the alveolar bone edge made it impossible to reconstruct the crowns. Treatment planning includes the extraction of two teeth, socket grafting with Bone Apatite®. Two implants are placed 3 months after grafting.

Due to the lack of bony support in the lower jaw, and the mobility of the teeth, it was decided to extract all of the teeth and move to an implant supported bridge which provides posterior occlusal support with immediate loading. On the upper maxilla all remaining teeth are preserved except for tooth #27 (15), using zygomatic and pterygoid implants in order to achieve immediate loads in those areas as well.

Tras la extracción del primer molar se observa una placa bucal faltante. Se completa el injerto con Bond Apatite y se coloca el implante 4 meses después de la operación.

Este video demuestra la necesidad de preservar hueso disponible cuando se extraen dientes en preparación para implantes.

Una mujer de 82 años se presentó con hinchazón y dolor en el lado izquierdo de la mejilla y el labio, y el síntoma de Vincent. Se eliminó el quiste y se rellenó el defecto con Bond Apatite. El seguimiento mostró una remodelación hueso muy buena y no se observaron síntomas inflamatorios.

En este caso hubo una fractura vertical y una fístula. Extracción e implante inmediato con 3D Bond.

reconstruir de reborde mandibular con implantes inmediatos.

Extracciones y reconstruir de la cresta del maxilar con colocación inmediata de cemento .

Extracción y enucleación de quistes en los incisivos superiores. La conservación del alveolo y el relleno del defecto se completan con Bond Apatite.

paciente sano. Acudió a consulta por dolor en el n.º 11 (8). La radiografía no era nada convincente pero el examen clínico nos hizo pensar en una fractura radicular. Realicé un gran colgajo de espesor completo y realicé un relleno hueso con sulfato de calcio bifásico (Augma Bond Apatite), con la esperanza de limitar la pérdida de ancho después de una extracción traumática. Se utilizó una esponja de colágeno para cubrir el injerto .

La corona del n.º 46 (n.º 30) tenía 6 meses y seguía doliendo a pesar de las semanas de antibióticos. Nuestra decisión fue extraer el diente e injerto sulfato de calcio bifásico (Augma Bond Apatite® ) para recuperar el mayor volumen hueso posible. Después de 6 meses, y una restitución completa del volumen hueso , se colocó un implante (Surcam, tipo S, 5x 13) en un hueso verdadero.

Paciente femenina, de 76 años, acude a la consulta con falta de dientes mandibulares, dificultades para masticar, falta de estética y molestia en la mandíbula. Después del examen intra-oral y la realización de los exámenes complementarios, verificamos la existencia de 4 dientes restantes en mal estado, una raíz con un quiste grande y 2 implantes antiguos con un mal posicionamiento para utilizar en una rehabilitación total.  Planificación All-on-4: Extracción de los dientes y raíz restantes, extracción de los dos implantes antiguos, nivelación de la plataforma ósea y colocación de 4 implantes con carga inmediata.

Una mujer sana de 55 años asiste a la consulta con ausencia casi total de los dientes maxilares. tras la evaluación de los exámenes complementarios, se confirmó que había una gran pérdida horizontal de hueso, así como la pneumatización bilateral de los senos maxilares. La paciente usaba una prótesis superior extraíble y quería pasar a usar una rehabilitación fija.

Extracción total de los dientes superiores e inferiores; Colocación de 5 implantes inferiores; Carga inferior inmediata; Corrección de defectos óseos maxilares y mandibulares; Elevación de seno bilateral superior; 6 meses después, All-on-6 maxilar con carga inmediata.

The patient presented with two small cysts. Root resection was performed along with cyst enucleation . The defect was filled with Augma Bond Apatite. 2-year follow-up showed good remodeling of the bone and soft tissue healing.

In this video Bond Apatite is used to fill a defect in the area of the lower, right incisor with a missing buccal plate. Four months post-op an implant is placed in new bone.

In this video see the implant placement in the area of the maxillary incisors, and lateral augmentation using the tunneling technique.

Extraction of hopeless premolars #24 (12) & #25 (13). The treatment plan included extraction and socket grafting, and the placement of two implants during a second stage. A closed sinus lift was performed using Bond Apatite® with the distal implant placement.

A bridge in the lower left molars and premolars is replaced with 4 implants. During the uncovery Biphasic Calcium Sulfate is used to aid in soft tissue growth.

Paciente con prótesis maxilar híbrida soportada en un sistema All-on-4  Quejas de dolor e hinchazón en el 1er cuadrante; Supuración abundante en la zona del implante posterior derecho.  Remoción del implante infectado y antibioterapia; 1,5 meses después, apertura de retalho, limpieza de la zona y reconstrucción ósea con Augma Bond Apatite®; 5 meses después, colocación de un nuevo implante en el sitio injertado; 6 meses después, carga en el implante utilizando la prótesis antigua; Durante todo el tratamiento, el paciente usará su prótesis solo fijada en 3 implantes.

Intra oral images showing failed bridge in an otherwise healthy 60 year old male. Referred to the surgeon due to recurrent inflammation and discomfort in the upper right maxilla. Periimplantitis signs are evident.

Extraction using a magnetic mallet to avoid the distal implant with flap elevation. Prep at the palatal socket relying on the interradicular bone. Augma Bond Apatite® was placed first and then the osteotomy was uncovered and then the implant is placed. After which the Augma Shield™ was placed with a quick adaptation. It was held in place with 5-0 sutures.

Socket grafting of #48 (32) with Augma Bond Apatite® (x 3) following the root treatment of #47 (31) is realized.

The patient is a healthy, 67 year old female who presented with a root fracture of tooth #13 (6). The patient complained of dissatisfaction with the color of the tooth, and the inability to chew due to pain and discomfort.

Patient is a 74 year old male, healthy non smoker. Tooth #26 (14) was under follow up after rehabilitation that took place more than 20 years ago, with another clinic. Recently the patient experienced pain and swelling, as well as discharge. Due to the infection and periapical lesions detected we decided to extract.

This video shows a full arch rehabilitation with bilateral open sinus lift.

This is a sinus lift with two windows due to a partial septum. Bond Apatite® was used in the sinus lift, and was placed directly into the chamber.

En hueso de mala calidad, aumentar el diámetro del implante puede ser la única forma de aumentar la tolerancia a las fuerzas oclusales, mejorar la estabilidad inicial y proporcionar una distribución de tensión favorable al hueso circundante. Los implantes más cortos, aquellos con conos de bloqueo y formas de raíz de meseta, tienden a tener tiempos de supervivencia más prolongados al usar sulfato de calcio bifásico.

Root resection was performed on teeth #12 (7) and #22 (10). At this same time, cyst enucleation with histopathological examination confirmed radicular cysts. The bone defect was filled with Bond Apatite® (1 cc). More Bond Apatite® was used in #12 (7) and #22 (10).

In this case Bond Apatite is used for socket grafting after extraction, and lateral augmentation. The socket is covered with the Augma Shield to protect the material during the initial healing stage.

Discomfort and tooth mobility of the left upper lateral incisor. A fistula was detached buccally near the apex zone of the tooth. Radiographic imagery revealed a large radiolucency in connection with the tooth apex. The tooth was extracted and the lesion removed, followed by augmentation with Bond Apatite.

A how-to video in which Dr. Amos Yahav shows the protocols for Socket Grafting with flap reflection, using bone cements and the Augma Shield™.

Dr. Amos Yahav shows the protocols for Socket Grafting with Bond Apatite® and the Augma Shield™

presented with diffuse palatal swelling and mild pain in the upper left first molar. The tooth was sectioned and removed without any palatal or buccal flap. Augma was placed with sutures and a collagen plug.

The first molar #30 (46) was extracted and augmentation was done with Augma Bond Apatite®. Re-entry for implant placement was 3 months post-op. Radiographic evaluation was done 3 and 6 months post-op. Follow up after 4 years of clinical function illustrates the stability of the bone level, and the process of bone remodeling and maturation.

Dr. Stéphane Berg discusses changing dogmas and the evolution of dentistry, first for himself and then for others. His way of confronting dogmas, through the dissonance between periodontology and implantology and later while adopting new bone grafting principles, allowed him to become an expert in his field.

Following the 2nd International Symposium, we had the greatest pleasure to host Dr. Jose Camelo Ferreira in The Bone Cement Podcast. Dr. Ferreira shares the mindset that led him to pursue his professional and personal path over alternative routes, and how he puts himself in a position to show colleagues how to work differently.

The patient is a 40 year old female who came to the clinic with crowns on teeth #21 (9) & #11 (8) that are failing and show signs of infection. CBCT shows missing buccal bone. The treatment plan included extraction and immediate implants with Bond Apatite® to fix the dehiscence.

Colocación de cemento en maxilar. Se extraen los dientes remanentes de la mandíbula, seguido de preservación de la cresta y colocación inmediata del cemento .

The first surgery will be a full maxillary horizontal bone augmentation, double nasal sinus elevation and extraction of the 6 remaining teeth. The patient will use a fully fixed removable prosthesis supported only on the palate. 6 months later, a guided surgery will be planned and executed  with the placement of 6 implants with immediate load. After another 6 months, the definitive hybrid prosthesis will be made.

Quitar lo puente viejo sobre los implantes #45/#47, apertura de colgajo, remoción de tejido de granulación, limpieza y desinfección de la superficie del implante con el sistema GalvoSurge, extracción con implante y carga inmediata del diente 44 y reemplazo del puente antiguo esterilizado en autoclave durante la cirugía. 4 meses después, se realizará la corona definitiva sobre el nuevo implante (#44).

Se demuestra lesión periapical y resorción radicular alrededor del diente #23 (#11). El diente se sometió a repetidos tratamientos de conducto por parte del endodoncista y ciclos de antibióticos sin mejoras.

The patient is a 19 year old female, coming for implant treatment on #21 (9). Tooth #21 (9) is missing after a fall 10 years earlier. CBCT shows a very thin crest and a need for lateral augmentation. The challenge is to keep the papilla and the gingival contour (aesthetic zone) despite the surgery.

Augmentation of the maxillary sinus when severe atrophy and/or pneumatization of the sinus has occurred results in minimal crestal height that will not allow simultaneous implant placement has been a clinical challenge. The lateral sinus augmentation approach has been traditionally utilized in these clinical situations, but there are known complications such as membrane tears and increased post-operative issues that follow use of this technique. This article aims to propose a new technique utilizing specific surgical instruments, making it possible to increase the height of the crestal bone under the maxillary sinus in cases of significant atrophy, without complications using a two-stage crestal approach with biphasic calcium sulphate as the graft material. The article will discuss the technique, present a case example and review 51 cases representing initially 1-3 mm sub sinus crestal bone heights that the technique was utilized with.

Extraction of the natural tooth may be a prelude to implant placement. This may be done using an immediate placement protocol or require a delayed approach depending on multiple factors that include residual infection related to the failed tooth being extracted, availability of bone to stabilize the implant at placement, or soft tissue issues. Socket preservation is recommended when the delayed approach is selected to create an osseous bed with adequate height and width that can accommodate the implant that is planned.

Periodontitis, Stage III, Grade C, with molar incisor pattern. They demonstrated bleeding, deep pockets and vertical bone resorption.

The patient was referred by his treating dentist following repeat acute phases. The decision to extract is done with antibiotics and corticosteroid coverage. GBR will be performed during the surgical stage, with Augma Bond Apatite.

Here we have three different cases of the extraction of wisdom teeth (3rd Molars) using Bond Apatite for socket grafting and GBR.